On August 10th 1792, a little more than three years after their attack on the Bastille, the people of Paris laid siege to another royalist symbol. This time the target was the Tuileries palace, the official residence of Louis XVI and the home of the Legislative Assembly. The king had been resident at the Tuileries since the people of Paris marched on Versailles in October 1789. The abbé Pous, a witness to these events, wrote “from now on our monarchs will live at the Tuileries; this revolution took less than 24 hours”. Life in the Tuileries – a dilapidated castle on the right bank of the Seine, not used as a regular royal residence since the days of Louis XIV – was a humiliating step down from the grandeur of Versailles. There was no hunting, no carriage rides in the grounds, no Petit Trianon or Hameau de la Reine. Parisian newspapers cheekily reported that the king’s only hobby at the Tuileries was walking around the castle until “healthy perspiration required him to stop”.
After October 1789 the royal court continued to operate at the Tuileries, as it had at Versailles. It was still attended by nobles and foreign dignitaries; it maintained many of its rituals and retained at least some of its grandeur. There was no serious opposition to this in the National Constituent Assembly: the deputies thought it important to maintain a grand royal court, to impress foreign visitors and uphold national prestige. Nevertheless the Assembly spent weeks discussing cuts to royal spending. In consultation with the king, the assembly voted to cut spending on the royal household to 25 million livres, a reduction of around 15-20 million livres from the old civil list. The king retained ownership of several larger palaces and land holdings, most notably Versailles, Saint-Cloud and Fountainebleau, while others were sold to alleviate the national debt. These cuts satisfied most in the Assembly, though they did not go far enough for the radical political clubs and sans culottes of Paris.
From the autumn of 1789 Louis XVI lived as a virtual prisoner in the Tuileries. According to Lafayette, a regular visitor to the palace, the only sign the king was not free was the fact he no longer went hunting. Louis’ surroundings were comfortable and extravagant; he was attended by dozens of servants and courted on by foreigners and nobles. But for all this, Louis was a captive. His presence in the capital was a focal point for Parisian mobs and, occasionally, their exuberance spilled over into confrontation. On February 28th 1791 a group of 400 noblemen, hearing rumours that an attack on the king’s life was imminent, took up arms and entered the Tuileries to protect him. A stand off between the noblemen and a growing crowd of sans culottes developed and threatened to erupt into violence. The nobles were eventually disarmed by Lafayette and sent home at the king’s order. This journée became known as the ‘Day of Daggers’ or the ‘Poignard conspiracy’. Several weeks later, in April, another working class mob gathered at the gates of the Tuileries, blocking the royal family’s carriage and preventing them departing for their summer residence at Saint-Cloud. This confrontation confirmed the king’s status as a prisoner in the Tuileries. It was probably the tipping point in his decision to flee Paris in June.
Events in the summer of 1791 further endangered the king. The flight to Varennes (June 1791) saw the royal family returned under guard to the Tuileries, where they now lived under visible house arrest. Jacobin and Cordeliers petitions calling for a republic, and the Champ de Mars massacre that followed (July 1791), revealed the rising anti-royalism in Paris. In the final two months of 1791 the king further riled the people by vetoing the Legislative Assembly’s decrees on émigrés and non-juring priests. In June 1792 an armed crowd stormed the Tuileries, condemning the king as “Monsieur Veto” and demanding that he pass all decrees. A group carrying weapons and a small artillery piece gained access to the king’s quarters and one man bearing an axe approached the king. Louis XVI managed to quell the invaders by listening to their demands and politely promising to consider them. He then donned a red liberty bonnet and toasted the health of the nation. In another room, the queen and her children were also surrounded by a hostile mob. Antoinette’s 14-year-old daughter later described the incident:
“We were obliged to stay there and listen to all the insults that these wretches said to us as they passed. A half clothed woman dared to come to the table with a bonnet rouge in her hand and my mother was forced to let her place it on her son’s head. As for us, we were obliged to put cockades on our heads. It was, as I have said, about eight o’clock when this dreadful procession of rioters ceased to pass and we were able to rejoin my father and aunt.”
These outrages against the king and his family, as well as Louis’ polite and courageous response, won the royals a measure of sympathy and respect – but this was not to last. By late July 1792 the situation in Paris had deteriorated further. Economic conditions remained dire and were exacerbated by the threat of foreign invasion. On July 25th 1792 the Duke of Brunswick issued his notorious war manifesto, promising to wreak vengeance on Paris if the king or his family came to any harm. On the streets of the capital, rabble rousing journalists like Jean-Paul Marat and Camille Desmoulins whipped up anger towards the king, Lafayette, Bailly, the Legislative Assembly and the still moderate Paris Commune. By the first days of August, Paris was filled with rumours about the fate of the king. Some believed the Austrians and Prussians were about to stage a daring raid to rescue Louis and his family from the Tuileries. Others believed the king was plotting to flee to Rouen.
Unlike the transgressions of June, the August insurrection had planners and leaders, most notably the Cordeliers orator Georges Danton and Jacobin powerbroker Maximilien Robespierre. On August 9th delegates from the sections occupied the Hôtel de Ville and took control of the Paris Commune. It was reformed as an ‘Insurrectionary Commune’, the ranks of its council now dominated by sans culottes instead of bourgeois lawyers. The following day a mob formed, peopled from the sections and backed by the political clubs and the new Commune. It was joined by several units of fédérés (radical republican troops of the National Guard) from Brittany and Marseille. Together this coalition of soldiers and sans culottes crossed the river and marched west to the Tuileries. The palace was protected by a garrison of loyalist National Guard, as well as hundreds of gendarmes and almost a thousand soldiers of the Swiss Guard (foreign mercenaries hired to provide the king’s bodyguard). Tactically, the Tuileries should have been easy to defend. It had strong fortifications, it was protected on one side by the Seine, and unlike the Bastille it was heavily manned. But the gendarmes and National Guard in the Tuileries were unreliable. Anticipating a massacre, most fled during the night of August 9th.
By dawn on August 10th a crowd of several thousand people was massing outside the Tuileries. Newcomers arrived so quickly from the sections that according to one news report 25 people were killed in the crush. Most of the crowd were carrying some kind of weapon: guns, sabres, pikes, daggers, scythes, iron bars and pieces of wood. After surveying the situation, the king concluded that it was impossible to defend the palace with slaughtering thousands of Parisians. Leaving orders with the guard, Louis and his family walked across the Tuileries garden and took refuge in the Legislative Assembly building. Back inside the palace, rebellious soldiers and civilians breached the palace gates and poured into the Tuileries courtyard. Exactly happened next is a matter of dispute. Whatever the cause, members of the mob and advancing fédérés engaged in a pitched battle with the Swiss Guard. The Swiss held them off until around midday, when their ammunition ran out and they were overrun.
What followed was a scene of tremendous butchery. More than two thirds of the Swiss Guard were slaughtered, many of them hacked to death by axe-wielding sans culottes. Heads were removed and displayed on pikes or kicked around for sport. Body parts were dismembered and waved around, then fed to dogs. Hordes of women from the city’s underclass followed behind the advancing soldiers, stripping the corpses of Swiss Guardsmen of their uniforms and belongings, scything off the genitals and stuffing them into their mouths. Courtiers and palace staff were not spared either. By the end of the day some 650 Swiss Guards were dead, while the remaining 250 were captured, beaten and thrown into the city’s prisons. Four weeks later, almost all of the guards who survived the carnage of August 10th were killed during the September Massacres.
Meanwhile the king, his family and their inner circle sought refuge in the chamber of the Legislative Assembly. Under the leadership of the skilled orator Pierre Vergniaud, the Assembly agreed to provide the king with sanctuary. The promise was a hollow one, since the Assembly building was largely unguarded. By midday the hall was surrounded by thousands of republican soldiers and armed Parisians. The Assembly’s deputies received an ultimatum, via members of the radical Commune, demanding the abolition of the monarchy and the voluntary dissolution of the Assembly itself. Their position effectively hopeless, the Assembly’s deputies quickly acquiesced to these demands. On August 11th the Legislative Assembly voted to suspend the king, replacing him with a five-man executive council. It also convened democratic elections for a new national convention, scheduled for the following month.
This 24 hours produced more political change than any of the revolution’s other journées. France was transformed from a constitutional monarchy to a burgeoning republic; the moderate Paris Commune was replaced by radicals from the sections. The deposed king and his family were imprisoned in the Temple in northern Paris. The Legislative Assembly, under pressure from the Commune, voted itself into oblivion and prepared to hand power to a new national convention. The Constitution of 1791 was abandoned and its distinctions between ‘active’ and ‘passive citizens’ were discarded; elections for the new convention would be based on universal suffrage. On August 25th the Assembly voted to abolish all feudal dues without compensation, unless the seigneur could produce a valid contract (few of them could). This resolution virtually ended seigneurialism in France, going much further than the August Decrees of 1789. The revolutionary Commune, now under the control of Danton and other radicals, held sway in the capital, silencing royalist and moderate publishers and arresting scores of nobles and non-juring priests. The Marquis de Lafayette, outraged at the events of August 10th, tried to organise a counter-revolution to restore the monarchy. Unable to drum up enough support and facing arrest himself, Lafayette fled France and the revolution, ending up a prisoner of the Austrians.
1. The August 10th 1792 attack on the Tuileries was an insurrectionary action by republican soldiers and the people of Paris, who wanted to depose the king and abolish the monarchy.
2. This attack was fuelled by poor economic conditions, foreign aggression, fears of foreign invasion, the king’s use of the veto power and rumours of another royal attempt to flee Paris.
3. On August 9th radicals seized control of the Paris Commune, a move planned and carried out by the Paris sections and members of the radical political clubs.
4. The following day soldiers and civilians marched on the Tuileries, the royal residence in Paris. While the king fled and took refuge in the Legislative Assembly, the attackers invaded the Tuileries and slaughtered most of the soldiers there.
5. In the aftermath of this attack the Legislative Assembly suspended the king, abolished the monarchy, cancelled unverified feudal dues, voted for its own dissolution and convened elections for a new national convention.
This page was written by Jennifer Llewellyn and Steve Thompson. To reference this page, use the following citation:
J. Llewellyn and S. Thompson, “The attack on the Tuileries”, Alpha History, accessed [today’s date], http://alphahistory.com/frenchrevolution/attack-on-the-tuileries/.