The Great Fear (in French, Grande Peur) was a wave of peasant riots and violence that swept through France in July and August 1789. These riots were sparked by economic concerns, rural panic and the power of rumour.
Already excited by the summer’s political developments, France’s peasants heard and shared rumours about roving bands of brigands, possibly paid by royalists.
These brigands, it was reported, were rampaging through the countryside, raiding villages and stealing grain.
These rumours appeared in different places, took different forms and invoked different responses.
Many peasants responded by arming themselves and mobilising to defend their property. Some went further and engaged in revolutionary violence, taking to the road, looting the châteaux of landed aristocrats and destroying feudal contracts. The peasants, it seems, became the destructive brigands they had initially feared.
While few people were killed during the Great Fear, property worth millions of livres was either stolen or destroyed. The Great Fear certainly had an impact on political events, contributing to the National Assembly’s abolition of feudalism on August 4th.
The story of the Great Fear begins with paranoia about outsiders. Peasant communities were, by their nature, insular and suspicious of outsiders. They regarded strangers and newcomers with a suspicious eye. Some of this was because new arrivals might compete for labour, food and charity provided by the local parish.
By the late 1780s, peasants in many regions were accustomed to outsiders arriving in their village, usually in the middle of the year when good weather made travel easier.
Some of these outsiders were landless labourers or destitute townspeople in search of paid work. Others were beggars, vagrants and outcasts, who decided that living off the land or seeking the charity of farmers was a better option than starving in the cities.
The hunger of 1789
The situation became critical in the spring of 1789 as France endured its worst food crisis in years. While thousands in the cities starved or handed over almost all their wages for even, even the peasants’ own small stores of grain were dwindling.
According to John Albert White, who translated Georges Lefebvre‘s pivotal study of the Great Fear, the numbers of itinerants in rural areas reached levels never seen before:
“Unemployed workers, displaced by the crisis in industry, were everywhere in search of jobs… Vagrants and beggars, always a source of concern to the small rural proprietor, choked the roads and threatened reprisals against householders who refused to give them shelter or a crust of bread. Hungry men and women invaded forests and fields and stripped them of firewood or grain, before the harvest was ripe to the gathered.”
Peasant fear and paranoia
Peasant communities were also unsettled by the political events of 1788-89. The convocation of the Estates-General and the drafting of the cahiers created a mood of optimism and anticipation across the country. The process of writing the cahiers had brought peasants together to discuss their situation and share their grievances, particularly the burdens of royal taxes and feudal dues.
News of the formation of the National Assembly, the Tennis Court Oath and the king’s acceptance of reform caused excitement in peasant communities – but this excitement was short lived.
In mid-July, news reached the provinces that the king had mobilised his troops and sacked his popular director of finance, Jacques Necker. This sparked rumours and conspiracy theories that a royalist or aristocratic counter-revolution was imminent.
These stories took different forms in different regions. The most common rumour was that the king or his conservative nobles had employed bands of foreign troops or brigands to march into the provinces and bring the people to their knees with violence, looting and wanton destruction.
The Great Fear spreads
These fears of royal and aristocratic retribution spread exponentially in late July. Rising peasant unrest only served to intensify the power of rumour (as the great historian Lefebvre himself put it, “fear bred fear”).
Lefebvre and later historians have attempted to track the course of the Great Fear, with limited success. The circulation of rumour was fast – almost too fast for the age – and sporadic. It did not always follow logical transport routes, such as rivers and roads. There are accounts of the same rumour appearing in places 20 miles apart on the same day.
As these rumours circulated, some peasant communities became convinced that hired brigands were marching toward their village. In this paranoid climate, even the most benign event – a sighting of strangers, movement in the distance, smoke on the horizon – could trigger a panicked response.
In Angoulême, for example, thousands of men were armed and mobilised after spotting a cloud of raised dust. A peasant militia in Champagne was raised after locals saw men sneaking through a nearby wood; the ‘invaders’ turned out to be cows.
Organisation and leadership
In some villages or small towns, the Great Fear had a measure of organisation and leadership. Locals gathered on the village green or square to hear from their local representatives. Some resolved to make a preemptive strike against potential counter-revolutionaries.
Large bands of peasants, sometimes entire villages, would gather up arms and hit the road in search of targets. Their violence was not indiscriminate (they targeted only the symbols of feudal authority) nor was it bloodthirsty (fewer than 20 people were reported killed during the panic of July-August). The damage to private property, however, was extensive.
It was the landed aristocracy and seigneurs who suffered worse. Their châteaux (country homes) were besieged, invaded, looted and, in most cases, set alight. Written records bearing names, land holdings, feudal contracts and obligations – for example, ledgers showing which peasants were subject to the champart, whose quitrents were due, who owed labour for the corvée – were eagerly sought and immediately destroyed.
This sabotage of feudal records was quite intentional. By destroying the documents and records of seigneurial feudalism, the peasants hoped to destroy it or at least make it unworkable.
The worst of the Great Fear riots broke out in Dauphiné, south-eastern France, in late July. Beginning in Bourgoin, gangs of peasants engaged in a five-day orgy of destruction, ransacking and burning numerous châteaux until they were dispersed by volunteer soldiers from Lyons and Grenoble. The nobles themselves were not harmed – unless they tried to resist.
Lefebvre reports only three murders during the Great Fear. One of the victims was Michel de Montesson, a nobleman from Douillet who weeks before had sat with the Second Estate at Versailles.
Scores of nobles were chased out of their homes, if not the district. There were instances of aristocrats being held to ransom and forced to renounce their feudal rights over peasants on the estate.
Some nobles were themselves taken in by rumours of roaming brigands. At Limousin in central France, Baron de Drouhet and Baron de Belinay gathered a militia to protect the citizens of Saint-Angel from a rumoured attack. Unfortunately for both barons, guards at Saint-Angel mistook them for spies. The two noblemen were bound and gagged and transported by cart to Limoges.
Debates over causes and motive
The Great Fear was a peculiar uprising in that it was spontaneous, sporadic and disorganised. Historians have not yet presented a convincing account of what drove the panic of July and August 1789.
One theory, advanced by Mary Matossian in the late 1980s but disregarded by most historians, was that riotous peasants had eaten stored flour contaminated with ergot. The ergot fungus contains lysergic acid, the active compound in the narcotic LSD, and if eaten in sufficient quantities might cause hallucinations and paranoid delusions.
Whatever its true causes, the Great Fear had three significant outcomes. First, it showed the peasantry could mobilise to defend itself against an aristocratic counter-revolution. Second, it eradicated or crippled many aspects of an already weakening seigneurial system. Third, the Great Fear sent a clear message to members of the National Constituent Assembly about the depth of peasant hatred toward feudal dues.
A historian’s view:
“The political crisis played an important part, for the excitement it provoked made the people restless and unruly. Every beggar, vagrant and rioter seemed a ‘brigand’. There had always been great anxiety at harvest time: it was a moment the peasants dreaded… The uprising in Paris… spread the fear of brigands far and wide, and at the same time, the people anxiously waited for the defeated aristocrats to take their revenge on the Third Estate with the aid of foreign troops. No one doubted for a moment that they had taken the promised brigands into their pay.”
1. The Great Fear (Grande Peur) was a brief but intense wave of peasant riots and uprisings in July and August 1789, triggered by political unrest, rumour and panic.
2. The context for this panic was the economic suffering of mid-1789, the political developments at Versailles and the peasantry’s long-standing fear and suspicion of outsiders.
3. In mid-July, peasants heard rumours that the king and/or his aristocrats had hired gangs of mercenaries or brigands to destroy their crops or property, as a means of imposing political control.
4. They took up arms and mobilise to defend themselves. Some went on long marches, attacking the châteaux of nobles, looting, burning and destroying feudal records.
5. The Great Fear not only exposed the depth of peasant feeling about feudal dues, it caused some consternation among the Second Estate and the deputies of the National Constituent Assembly.
Perigny on the Great Fear peasant uprisings (1789)
Title: “The Great Fear”
Authors: Jennifer Llewellyn, Steve Thompson
Publisher: Alpha History
Date published: September 23, 2019
Date accessed: March 11, 2023