The economic crisis of the 1780s

economic crisis of the 1780s
State banknotes from the 1780s

The United States may have emerged from the Revolutionary War victorious, but economically it was in dire straits. The strain of a long and costly war had exhausted both state treasuries and private wealth. Both the new national government ($54 million) and the states ($21 million) were left with massive war debts, chiefly to foreign powers such as France. There was a shortage of specie or ‘hard currency’, mainly because the Currency Act of 1764 had depleted America’s reserves of gold and silver in the years before the revolution. American governments had attempted to fund the war through excessive printing runs of paper money (see picture, right). The states had printed $209 million of notes, Congress $241 million — and these ‘bills of promise’ had begun to lose their value almost as soon as they hit the streets. By 1781, a paper Continental dollar was worth about five per cent of a silver dollar, giving rise to the idiom ‘not worth a Continental’. And America’s balance of trade was extremely negative, meaning she imported significantly more than she exported, exacerbating the problems mentioned above.

The country and its states were bankrupt and in considerable debt, yet they drew only small amounts of revenue from taxation – Congress drew none at all – so each struggled to redress the situation. The United States had no effective currency and no reserve bank to regulate it. And there was also a collapse in public credit as ordinary Americans, often returned unpaid or underpaid Continental soldiers, borrowed heavily from urban creditors in order to establish farms or homes – then were unable to meet repayments due to the slumping agricultural market of the mid-1780s. Some state assemblies responded to this suffering, tension, unrest and (by 1786) uprisings by easing taxation and cancelling or reducing private debt. Private creditors saw their wealth evaporate thanks to irresponsible state government, fuelling demands for a reform of the Articles of Confederation.

“Surveying his native Virginia, James Madison observed in mid-1785 that ‘the trade of the country is in deplorable condition’ with prices for tobacco – a major export – slipping 50 per cent. Wholesale prices for farm products in Philadelphia in 1786 dropped by nearly two-thirds from 1784 levels… One recent estimate calculated the economy declined by 41 per cent between 1774 and 1790.”
Ballard C. Campbell, historian

There had already been attempts to resolve America’s economic crisis. In January 1782 Robert Morris, who had contributed more than $2 million of his own wealth to the war effort, proposed the establishment of a national bank, a national mint and a system of decimal coins. He was given authority to undertake economic reform but resigned in 1784, finding coordination of Congress and the states to be near impossible. Individuals and groups favouring strong national government and responsible economic management began to muster as America slipped into deep recession in 1784-5. Whether the Articles of Confederation actually caused this recession – or just made a political response more difficult than it should have been – is a point of some dispute amongst historians. The consensus is that the Articles of Confederation failed and were not capable of providing effective government for the new nation. Some like H. A. Scott Trask, however, believe that the Articles are unfairly denigrated and that the real economic culprits – debts, inflation, shortage of specie and imbalance of trade – were painful but temporary after-effects of a long war.

Citation information
Title: “The economic crisis of the 1780s”
Authors: Jennifer Llewellyn, Steve Thompson
Publisher: Alpha History
Date published: February 20, 2015
Date accessed: July 05, 2022
Copyright: The content on this page may not be republished without our express permission. For more information on usage, please refer to our Terms of Use.